SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Identification of inverted U-shaped curve association between serum potassium and prodromal Parkinson's disease.

Clin Park Relat Disord · 2025-04-09

DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100323PMID: 40271390

Open accessbrief-report; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundThe association between serum potassium and prodromal Parkinson's disease (PPD) remains unclear currently.ObjectiveThe ultimate goal is to gain a deeper understanding of the implications of this association between serum potassium and PPD.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study involving 1035 participants in PPMI cohort. Age, sex, education years, race, body mass index (BMI), calcium, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lymphocytes, neutrophils, serum uric acid, serum sodium, serum potassium, creatinine, serum glucose were obtained from all participants. Logistic regression, and smooth curve fitting were utilized to substantiate the research objectives.ResultsThe overall PPD was 83.4 % (863/1035). Multivariate odds ratio regression adjusted for risk factors demonstrates a 1-unit increment in the serum potassium raises the risk of PPD by 1.82 times, respectively. Smooth splines analysis suggested an inverted U-shaped association between serum potassium and PPD (P nonlinearity ConclusionsThis study highlights the association between serum potassium levels and the risk of incident PPD, independent of confounders. The association between serum potassium and PPD is inverted U-shaped, the threshold value is 4.479 mmol/l.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.