SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Possible Significance of Neutrophil-Hemoglobin Ratio in Differentiating Progressive Supranuclear Palsy from Depression: A Pilot Study.

Diseases · 2025-04-18

DOI: 10.3390/diseases13040119PMID: 40277829

Open accessbrief-report; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundResearch has associated chronic inflammation with the evolution of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson's Disease (PD), Alzheimer's Disease (AD), and less common ones such as Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), are commonly linked to depression. However, the pathomechanisms and the role of neuroinflammation in these disorders remain unclear; therefore, interest is increasing in easily accessible inflammatory morphological assessments of blood samples, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio (NMR), and the neutrophil-to-hemoglobin ratio (N/HGBR).MethodsThe authors analyzed 15 age-matched controls and 21 patients with PSP; the PSP group was additionally divided into 11 patients without depression (PSP) and 10 with depression (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI] ≥ 14) (PSP-D).ResultsIn the PSP-D group, the level of N/HGBR was significantly lower than in the controls (p = 0.01), but there were no significant differences in any other neutrophil-derived parameters or comparisons of morphological blood assessment. Patients with PSP-D exhibited a marginally significant decrease in neutrophil levels compared to the controls.ConclusionsThis is the first study highlighting the possible significance of peripheral inflammatory factors in patients with PSP affected by depression. It highlights possible tendencies in the area of non-specific inflammatory markers and suggests their relation to affective disorders in PSP.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.