SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

White matter hyperintensity tissue property spatial variations as a function of cognitive status in Parkinson's disease.

Neuroimage · 2025-04-23

DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121236PMID: 40280215

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background and purposeThe pathological relationship between white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD) remains unclear due to their variable locations, heterogeneity, and limited assessment of underlying tissue properties. This study integrates T2-FLAIR and quantitative MRI (qMRI) to investigate burden, spatial distribution, and extent of tissue alterations in WMH, aiming to elucidate their role in cognitive decline among PD patients.MethodsA total of 122 age- and sex-matched PD patients and 65 healthy controls (HC) were recruited, with PD patients grouped by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score including normal, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or PD with dementia (PDD). WMH burden was compared across groups and cognitive status. Water content, T1, and T2* measures were derived from qMRI data and tissue property heatmaps and periventricular distance profiles were constructed for all groups to visualize location-dependent tissue alterations of WMH relative to the lateral ventricles. In addition, voxel-wise analysis was performed to examine the correlation between WMH lesion tissue properties and MoCA scores.ResultsWMH volume was significantly higher in PDD compared to other groups (p ConclusionOver and above volume differences, the spatial distribution and tissue property variations of WMH were closely linked to cognitive impairment in PD patients, with distinct patterns across different cognitive stages.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.