Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Chronic exposure to elevated levels of manganese (Mn) causes a neurological disorder referred to as manganism, with symptoms resembling Parkinson's disease (PD). The repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor (REST) has been shown to be neuroprotective in several neurological disorders, including PD, suggesting that identifying REST upregulation mechanisms is an important avenue for the development of novel therapeutics. 17β-estradiol (E2) activates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling, which is known to increase REST transcription. E2 and tamoxifen (TX), a selective estrogen receptor modulator, exerted protection against Mn toxicity. In this study, we tested if TX upregulates REST potentially via Wnt/β-catenin signaling in Cath.a-differentiated (CAD) neuronal cells using luciferase assay, qPCR, Western blot analysis, immunocytochemistry, mutagenesis, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and electrophoretic mobility shift assay. TX (1 μM) increased REST promoter activities and mRNA/protein levels and attenuated Mn (250 μM)-decreased REST transcription in parallel with TX's protective effects against Mn-induced toxicity, potentially via Wnt. TX activated Wnt/β-catenin signaling by preventing β-catenin degradation via inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta, leading to increased β-catenin levels and its nuclear translocation and binding to T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer binding factor sites on Wnt-responsive elements (WRE) of the REST promoter. Mutation of WRE abolished TX-induced REST promoter activity. TX-induced Wnt signaling activation was primarily via the estrogen receptor (ER)-α, although ER-β and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 also mediated TX's action on REST transcription. These findings underscore the critical role of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in TX-induced REST transcription, affording protection mechanisms against Mn toxicity and neurological disorders associated with REST dysfunction.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.