SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

CHAS infers cell type-specific signatures in bulk brain histone acetylation studies of neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Cell Rep Methods · 2025-04-28

DOI: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.101032PMID: 40300607

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Epigenomic profiling of the brain has largely been done on bulk tissues, limiting our understanding of cell type-specific epigenetic changes in disease states. Here, we introduce cell type-specific histone acetylation score (CHAS), a computational tool for inferring cell type-specific signatures in bulk brain H3K27ac profiles. We applied CHAS to >300 H3K27ac chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing samples from studies of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder in bulk postmortem brain tissue. In addition to recapitulating known disease-associated shifts in cellular proportions, we identified cell type-specific biological insights into brain-disorder-associated regulatory variation. In most cases, genetic risk and epigenetic dysregulation targeted different cell types, suggesting independent mechanisms. For instance, genetic risk of Alzheimer's disease was exclusively enriched within microglia, while epigenetic dysregulation predominantly fell within oligodendrocyte-specific H3K27ac regions. In addition, reanalysis of the original datasets using CHAS enabled identification of biological pathways associated with each neurological and psychiatric disorder at cellular resolution.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.