SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Chimeric deubiquitinase engineering reveals structural basis for specific inhibition of the mitophagy regulator USP30.

Nat Struct Mol Biol · 2025-05-05

DOI: 10.1038/s41594-025-01534-4PMID: 40325251

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The mitochondrial deubiquitinase ubiquitin-specific protease (USP) 30 negatively regulates PINK1-parkin-driven mitophagy. Whether enhanced mitochondrial quality control through inhibition of USP30 can protect dopaminergic neurons is currently being explored in a clinical trial for Parkinson's disease. However, the molecular basis for specific inhibition of USP30 by small molecules has remained elusive. Here we report the crystal structure of human USP30 in complex with a specific inhibitor, enabled by chimeric protein engineering. Our study uncovers how the inhibitor extends into a cryptic pocket facilitated by a compound-induced conformation of the USP30 switching loop. Our work underscores the potential of exploring induced pockets and conformational dynamics to obtain deubiquitinase inhibitors and identifies residues facilitating specific inhibition of USP30. More broadly, we delineate a conceptual framework for specific USP deubiquitinase inhibition based on a common ligandability hotspot in the Leu73 ubiquitin binding site and on diverse compound extensions. Collectively, our work establishes a generalizable chimeric protein-engineering strategy to aid deubiquitinase crystallization and enables structure-based drug design with relevance to neurodegeneration.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.