NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundEvidence linking noise pollution and brain health, particularly at mid-to-late life, remains scarce. We investigated the associations between long-term exposure to road and railway traffic noise and incident dementia in the UK Biobank cohort.MethodsParticipants with available data for dementia incidence and linked traffic noise exposure during follow-up were included. Residential road traffic noise from both minor and major roads were calculated in accordance with CNOSSOS-EU framework; railway noise estimates were created by Extrium, with the raster datasets representing noise contributions from major railway corridors. Cox regression was used to quantify the associations between transport noise and incident dementia (incl. its subtypes), adjusting for potential confounders, air pollution and greenness.ResultsOf the full cohort (n = 502,416), 7668 participants had incident dementia during a median follow-up period of 9.67 years. No associations were found between all cause dementia incidence and road or railway noise. However, a 10-dB (dB) higher exposure in annual mean road traffic noise (Lden) was significantly associated with incident Alzheimer's disease (HR:1.150, 95 % CI: 1.022-1.294). The effect estimate was slightly higher when participants were exposed to night-time road noise above 45 dB (HR:1.188, 95 % CI:1.012-1.394) and this was mediated by the cardiovascular health profile. Railway noise (Lden) was significantly associated with incident Parkinson's disease related dementia (HR:1.042, 95 % CI:1.005-1.081), however, the effect estimate was slightly reduced after further adjustment of air pollution and residential greenness (HR:1.037, 95 % CI:0.998-1.077).ConclusionDistinct associations between different traffic noise exposures and incident dementia subtypes were found in this large UK prospective cohort study.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.