Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
IntroductionP-glycoprotein (P-gp) or multidrug-resistance protein is one of the most extensively studied efflux transporters at the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Changes in P-gp function are associated with several neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia and with the bioavailability of several pharmaceuticals in the brain, causing multi-drug resistance or side effects. PET imaging can be used to measure the P-gp function in vivo. This study aims to validate [18F]MC225 as specific P-gp PET tracer with the use of cyclosporin as selective P-gp inhibitor.MethodsFourteen healthy volunteers (age 67 ± 5y) were included. Subjects underwent twice a 60 min dynamic [18F]MC225 (200MBq) PET scan with continuous arterial blood sampling and a cerebral T1-weighted MRI as anatomical reference. During the second scan, in five subjects, cyclosporin was administered in a dose of 2.5 mg/kg/hour, starting 30 min prior to the scan, to inhibit the BBB P-gp function. Tissue time-activity curves of preselected brain regions (Hammer's atlas) were fitted to a reversible two-tissue compartment model (2T4k) using the metabolite corrected plasma and uncorrected whole blood curves as input functions.ResultsNo significant difference was found in plasma kinetics, plasma curves, plasma-to-whole blood ratio, and the parent fraction of the baseline scans and scans after administration of cyclosporin. Volume of distribution values in whole brain grey matter showed a significant increase (6.18 ± 1.29 to 9.00 ± 1.29 mL·cm- 3,p = 0.03) after the administration of cyclosporin.ConclusionThe outcomes of the current study reflect the potential ability of [18F]MC225 to measure cyclosporin induced changes in P-gp function at the human BBB in vivo.Trial registrationEudraCT 2020-001564-28.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.