SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Adropin exerts neuroprotection in an experimental rat model of Parkinson's disease.

Iran J Basic Med Sci · 2025-01-01

DOI: 10.22038/ijbms.2025.82498.17830PMID: 40343287

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectivesThis study was planned to elucidate the mechanism of the protective effect of adropin in an experimental rat model of Parkinson's Disease (PD).Materials and methodsThree-month-old male Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups: i) Control, ii) Sham, iii) PD, and iv) PD+Adropin. The performance tests were performed seven days after the 6-Hydroxydopamine hydrochloride (6-OHDA) injection into the striatum. The immunoreactivities for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), G protein-coupled receptor 19 (GPR19), and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) were detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the substantia nigra (SN). Dopamine levels were measured by mass spectrometry. Glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) and pGSK3β (Ser9) protein levels were evaluated by western blot analysis.ResultsOur study demonstrated that motor performances were significantly improved by adropin treatment. Central adropin injection prevented the loss of nigral dopaminergic neurons and induced VEGFR2 expression but not GPR19 compared to the PD group. The ratio of p-GSK3β/GSK3β did not differ between groups. However, the level of dopamine in SN was increased with adropin injection in the PD+Adropin group.ConclusionOur findings reveal that adropin administration has a protective effect on nigral dopaminergic neurons and acts through the VEGFR2 signaling pathway.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.