SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

An approach to characterize mechanisms of action of anti-amyloidogenic compounds in vitro and in situ.

NPJ Parkinsons Dis · 2025-05-10

DOI: 10.1038/s41531-025-00966-5PMID: 40348747

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Amyloid aggregation is associated with neurodegenerative disease and its modulation is a focus of drug development. We developed a chemical proteomics pipeline to probe the mechanism of action of anti-amyloidogenic compounds. Our approach identifies putative interaction sites with high resolution, can probe compound interactions with specific target conformations and directly in cell and brain extracts, and identifies off-targets. We analysed interactions of six anti-amyloidogenic compounds and the amyloid binder Thioflavin T with different conformations of the Parkinson's disease protein α-Synuclein and tested specific compounds in cell or brain lysates. AC Immune compound 2 interacted with α-Synuclein in vitro, in intact neurons and in neuronal lysates, reduced neuronal α-Synuclein levels in a seeded model, and had protective effects. EGCG, Baicalein, ThT and doxycycline interacted with α-Synuclein in vitro but not substantially in cell lysates, with many additional putative targets, underscoring the importance of testing compounds in situ. Our pipeline will enable screening of compounds against any amyloidogenic proteins in cell and patient brain extracts and mechanistic studies of compound action.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.