SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Peak alpha frequency and alpha power spectral density as vulnerability markers of cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: an exploratory EEG study.

Front Neurosci · 2025-04-29

DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1575815PMID: 40364859

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundCognitive impairment substantially impacts quality of life in Parkinson's disease (PD), yet current biomarker frameworks lack sensitivity for detecting early-stage cognitive decline. While peak alpha frequency (PAF) and alpha power spectral density (PSD) have emerged as potential electrophysiological markers, prior studies primarily focused on global cortical measures, neglecting region-specific variations that may better reflect the heterogeneous nature of PD-related cognitive impairment (PDCOG). To address this gap, we conducted the first multiregional comparative analysis of PAF and alpha PSD between PDCOG and PD with normal cognition patients (PDNC).MethodsData from 76 participants (44 PD, 32 healthy controls) at The Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (March-July 2024) were analyzed. PAF and alpha PSD were computed across brain regions; cognitive function was assessed via MoCA.ResultsGlobal PAF was reduced in PD vs. controls (p p ConclusionPAF differentiates PD from controls and links to global cognition, while regional alpha PSD (notably P3, PZ, T6) effectively distinguishes PDCOG from PDNC. These findings underscore regional QEEG's utility in PD cognitive assessment, though sensitivity limitations warrant optimization.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.