SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Incidence of antiepileptic drug use in Parkinson's disease.

J Parkinsons Dis · 2025-05-23

DOI: 10.1177/1877718x251343079PMID: 40405650

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundAntiepileptics are used to treat epilepsy but also, e.g., neuropathic pain, essential tremor and dystonia. It is not known whether they are more commonly used in persons with Parkinson's disease (PD).ObjectiveTo assess the incidence of antiepileptic use in a nationwide cohort of persons with PD before and after the diagnosis and compared the findings to a matched cohort without PD.MethodsThis register-based Finnish nationwide cohort included 18365 persons diagnosed with PD between 2001-2015. Incidence of antiepileptic initiations, from 10 years before until 10 years after the PD diagnosis, was compared to an age-, sex-, and region-matched cohort without PD.ResultsAntiepileptics were more commonly initiated for persons with PD (29.3% of PD cohort and 15.2% of comparison cohort). Gabapentinoids were the most commonly initiated antiepileptics in both cohorts. A similar pattern in initiation rates was observed for both gabapentinoids and other antiepileptics, with increased incidence in the PD cohort approximately three years before the diagnosis and a significant peak around the time of PD diagnosis (the initiation rate at the time of PD diagnosis 3/100 and 1/100 person-years, for the PD and comparison cohorts, respectively). Clonazepam initiations were more common in the PD cohort (26.7% of initiations vs. 5.8% in the comparison cohort).ConclusionsThe increase in antiepileptic initiation rates before the diagnosis of PD suggests that they might be used for prodromal motor or non-motor symptoms.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.