SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Examining the Relationship Between Physical Function and Anxiety/Depression in Parkinson's.

Brain Behav · 2025-05-01

DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70563PMID: 40418655

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD) is a complex neurological disorder characterized by both motor and nonmotor symptoms, including tremor, muscle stiffness, anxiety, and depression.ObjectivesThe primary aim of this study was to examine the relationship between physical function and psychological symptoms, specifically anxiety and depression, in people with Parkinson's (PwP). The secondary aim was to explore whether any discrepancies between participant-reported and clinician-rated measures of physical function exist.MethodsThis study utilized the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) dataset, analyzing data from 1065 individuals with PD. Correlational analyses assessed relationships between clinician-rated and participant-reported motor outcomes alongside psychological symptoms. Multiple linear regression (MLR) was employed to identify predictors of anxiety and depression.ResultsIn PwP, significant correlations were found between depression/anxiety and participant-reported motor function (via MDS-UPDRS Part II: r = 0.313 for depression, r = 0.284 for anxiety, p ConclusionsThis study highlights a discrepancy between psychological symptoms and their relationship with clinician-rated versus participant-reported motor function in PwP. Our findings suggest that factors such as age, cognitive level, and perceived physical function significantly influence this relationship. Consequently, it is crucial to consider psychological factors and participant-reported motor function when conducting clinical assessments and treatment planning for individuals with PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.