SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Longitudinal analysis of step counts in Parkinson's disease patients: insights from a web-based application and generalized additive model.

PeerJ · 2025-05-29

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.19519PMID: 40452938

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic neurological disorder that affects millions of people worldwide. A common motor symptom associated with PD is gait impairment, leading to reduced step count and mobility.MethodsMonitoring and analyzing step count data can provide valuable insights into the progression of the disease and the effectiveness of various treatments. In our study, the generalized additive model (GAM) was used to identify statistically significant variables for step counts. Additionally, a web application was developed as an interactive visualization tool.ResultsThe GAM model shows that the following variables are statistically significant for daily step counts: sex (p = 0.03), handedness (p = 0.015), PD status of father (p = 0.056), COVID-19 status (Yes vs. No, p = 0.008), cohort (PD vs. Healthy, p p p = 0.0001).ConclusionsBased on the PPMI data, we find that sex, handedness, PD status of father, COVID-19 status, cohort, and the smoothing functions of age are all statistically significant for step counts. Additionally, a web application tailored specifically for step count analysis in PD patients was developed. This tool provides a user-friendly interface for patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals to track and analyze step count data, facilitating personalized treatment plans and enhancing the management of PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.