SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Radiological features of gait phenotypes in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2025-05-16

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1554642PMID: 40454207

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionAccording to the higher-level gait disorder (HLGD) pattern, patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) can be divided into two motor phenotypes; a disequilibrium (wide-based gait) subtype and a parkinsonian (locomotor) subtype. We aimed to understand the neuroimaging correlates of iNPH phenotyping into different gait patterns, by assessing specific radiological features and their correlations with clinical scores.MethodsWe enrolled 86 probable iNPH patients (53 males; age range: 69-88 years), who underwent a comprehensive clinical assessment, including neuropsychological tests, and a conventional MRI scan. The cohort was subdivided into disequilibrium subtype (29 subjects) and parkinsonian subtype of HLGD (57 patients) based on gait evaluation. We compared the iNPH subtypes assessing differences in eight linear radiological indexes and their clinical correlates.ResultsThe Height of the third ventricle was the only radiological feature that differed between the two motor phenotypes (p p DiscussionA greater height of the third ventricle possibly leading to a top-down compressive effect on the midbrain could be a neuroimaging marker of the parkinsonian phenotype of iNPH. The extensive correlations between linear radiological indices and clinical scales suggest a potential role for radiological features in clinical monitoring.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.