Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundEvidence indicates phenotypic and biological overlap between psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. Further identification of underlying mutual and unique biological mechanisms may yield novel multi-disorder and disorder-specific therapeutic targets. The metabolome represents an important domain for target identification as metabolites play critical roles in modulating a diverse range of biological processes.MethodsWe used Mendelian randomisation (MR) to test the causal effects of ~ 1000 plasma metabolites and ~ 300 metabolite ratios on anxiety, bipolar disorder, depression, schizophrenia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. Follow-up analyses were conducted using statistical colocalisation, multivariable Bayesian model averaging MR (MR-BMA) and polygenic risk score analysis in the UK Biobank.ResultsMR analyses identified 85 causal effects involving 77 unique metabolites passing FDR correction and robust sensitivity analyses (IVW-MR OR range 0.73-1.48; pFDR 4 ≥ 0.6) for a shared causal variant for 29 metabolite/psychiatric disorder trait-pairs on chromosome 11 at the FADS gene cluster. Most of these metabolites were lipids containing linoleic or arachidonic acid. Additional colocalisation was identified between the ratio of histidine-to-glutamine, glutamine, Alzheimer's disease and SPRYD4 gene expression on chromosome 12.ConclusionsAlthough no single metabolite had a causal effect on both a psychiatric and a neurodegenerative disease, results suggest a broad effect of lipids across brain disorders, with a particular role for lipids containing linoleic or arachidonic acid in psychiatric disorders. The metabolites identified here may help inform future targeted interventions.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.