SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Disrupted functional brain network associated with presence of hallucinations in Parkinson's disease.

Brain Commun · 2025-05-16

DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf185PMID: 40458458

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Hallucinations negatively impact quality of life in Parkinson's disease, yet their neural mechanisms remain poorly understood, particularly in early disease stages. This study aimed to identify functional connectivity differences associated with visual hallucinations in early Parkinson's disease and to validate these findings across independent datasets. Resting-state functional MRI data from two independent studies were used: the 'Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative' dataset was used as a discovery cohort (N = 25 hallucinators, N = 56 non-hallucinators) and the 'Incidence of Cognitive Impairments in Cohorts with Longitudinal Evaluation' dataset as replication (N = 49 hallucinators, N = 55 non-hallucinators overall). Group differences in functional connectivity were assessed within predefined cytoarchitectonic cortical classes and functional networks, followed by whole-brain analysis using Network-Based Statistics. This method identified a subnetwork of reduced functional connectivity in hallucinators, connecting regions involved in the default mode, somatomotor and attentional networks. Associations with clinical measures-including hallucination severity, motor symptoms, cognition and attention-were evaluated. Reduced functional connectivity in hallucinators was significantly associated with baseline and future motor symptoms, cognition and attention in the main cohort and with hallucination severity in the independent cohort. The identified functional subnetwork offers a potential direction for future research on Parkinson's disease psychosis.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.