SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Opicapone improves end-of-dose neuropsychiatric fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Clin Park Relat Disord · 2025-05-07

DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100343PMID: 40487741

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionNon-motor fluctuations (NMF) represent one of the main complications that patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) may experience during long-term levodopa treatment. Opicapone (OPC), a COMT-inhibitor indicated for end-of-dose motor fluctuations (MF), has not been extensively investigated for the management of NMF. We evaluate the efficacy of OPC on end-of-dose neuropsychiatric fluctuations, the most frequent and severe NMF.MethodsWe assessed 15 PD patients who underwent treatment with OPC (PD-OPC) compared to a control group of 15 PD patients (PD-CTRL). All patients had end-of-dose MF and NMF, confirmed by 19-item Wearing-Off Questionnaire (WOQ-19). For each, we identified the first end-of-dose deterioration period through MDS-UPDRS-III administered every 30 min over two consecutive days. On the third day, a comprehensive clinical and neuropsychological battery was administered during this designated period. Subsequently, OPC was prescribed to PD-OPC. After 6 months, patients were re-evaluated using the same baseline assessments during the same end-of-dose period.ResultsAt 6-month follow-up, PD-OPC showed significant improvement in the following tests: WOQ-19 (p p p p p p p = 0.001) and mood related-symptoms (BDI-II, HAM-A; both p = 0.001). There was a slightly significant difference in Visual Search (p = 0.018), and no differences in RAVLT-I (p = 0.323), and RAVLT-D (p = 0.155) scores. At follow-up, PD-CTRL showed no significant differences in WOQ-19, motor scales, and neuropsychological tests compared to baseline.ConclusionOPC improved end-of-dose fluctuations in anxiety/depression, and executive functions/attention, while memory and visuospatial abilities showed little or no significant changes.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.