SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and In Silico Study of Tetrahydropyridines as Prospective Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors.

ChemistryOpen · 2025-06-12

DOI: 10.1002/open.202400516PMID: 40509669

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The potentiality of monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzymes to break monoamine neurotransmitters makes them efficacious druggable targets. Molecules having MAO-A inhibition characteristics are utilized as antidepressants while molecules with MAO-B inhibition prospective are utilized to treat Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases. Herein, we have shown how the selective inhibition of both isozymes can be attained by varying the substitution of electron-withdrawing and donating groups on the phenyl rings of tetrahydropyridines, i. e., ethyl 1,2,6-triaryl-4-(arylamino)-1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine-3-carboxylate (4 a-4 o). The structures of these piperidines (4 a-4 o) were unambiguously established by different spectro-analytical techniques, including 1H- and 13C-NMR. Among the synthesized compounds, compounds 4 l and 4 n were identified as the most promising inhibitors of MAO-A and MAO-B, with IC50 values of 0.40±0.05 and 1.01±0.03 μM, respectively, compared with positive controls, namely clorgyline and l-deprenyl, with IC50 values of 0.0045±0.0003 and 0.0196±0.001 μM, respectively. The binding interactions of the most potent derivatives within the binding pocket of the MAO-A and MAO-B enzymes were predicted by molecular docking studies. Binding mode analysis revealed the capacity of compounds 4 l and 4 n to exhibit a hydrogen bond with PHE177 of MAO-A and GLN206 of MAO-B, respectively.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.