SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Safety, Cognitive, and Behavioral Outcomes in Patients with Dementia with Lewy Bodies Treated with Nilotinib.

J Clin Med · 2025-06-14

DOI: 10.3390/jcm14124245PMID: 40565990

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background/Objectives: We previously demonstrated that nilotinib can sufficiently enter the brain to pharmacologically inhibit discoidin domain receptors (DDR)-1 in patients with Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease. We primarily hypothesized that nilotinib is safe, and may alter disease-related biomarkers to improve, motor, cognitive and/or behavioral features in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Methods: Forty-three participants were randomized 1:1 into nilotinib, 200 mg, or matching placebo in a single-center, phase 2, randomized, double-blind study. Study drug was taken orally once daily for 6 months followed by one-month wash-out. Results: Of 43 individuals enrolled, 14 were women (33%); age (mean ± SD) was 73 ± 8.5 years. Nilotinib was safe and well-tolerated, and more adverse events were noted in the placebo (74) vs. nilotinib (37) groups (p = 0.054). The number of falls were reduced in the nilotinib (six) compared to placebo (21) group (p = 0.006). Cerebrospinal fluid homovanillic acid, a biomarker of dopamine levels, was increased (p = 0.004), while the ratio of pTau181/Aβ42 was reduced (p = 0.034). The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognition 14 improved by 2.8 pts (p = 0.037), and no differences were observed in Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale parts II and III. However, part I (cognition) improved (p = 0.044) in nilotinib compared to placebo. Conclusions: Nilotinib demonstrates favorable safety, biomarkers, and efficacy outcomes in patients with DLB supporting further trials in DLB or advanced Parkinson's disease with dementia.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.