SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Cell-type specific sensory and motor activity in the cuneiform nucleus and pedunculopontine nucleus in mice.

Sci Rep · 2025-07-01

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-05572-2PMID: 40594670

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The activity of neurotransmitter-based cell types in the cuneiform and pedunculopontine nuclei during locomotion, non-locomotor behaviors, and following sensory stimulation is not fully understood. Using fiber photometry in mice, we found cell-type specific responses to sensory stimuli. Glutamatergic and GABAergic cells responded to sound, visual looming, and air puffs, except for pedunculopontine GABAergic cells, which did not respond to visual looming. Cholinergic cells responded to air puffs. Air puffs triggered high-speed locomotion, whereas visual looming and sound stimuli evoked low-speed locomotion. During air puff-evoked locomotion, cuneiform glutamatergic neuron activity was higher than in trials without locomotion. In contrast, during locomotion evoked by visual looming or sound, activity in pedunculopontine glutamatergic neurons was higher than when no locomotion occurred. In the open-field arena, mice exhibited spontaneous low-speed locomotion during which activity increased in pedunculopontine glutamatergic cells. Activity also increased in a cell type-specific manner during grooming or rearing. Our study shows cell type-specific activity in the cuneiform or pedunculopontine nuclei during locomotion, non-locomotor behaviors, and following sensory stimulation. Sensory responsiveness likely has relevance in Parkinson's disease, where sensory circuits are increasingly targeted to improve walking.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.