SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Shared and disease-specific pathways in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.

Nat Med · 2025-07-15

DOI: 10.1038/s41591-025-03833-1PMID: 40665052

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs), such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), exhibit distinct yet overlapping pathological mechanisms. Leveraging large-scale plasma proteomics data from the Global Neurodegeneration Proteomics Consortium, we analyzed 10,527 plasma samples (1,936 AD, 525 PD, 163 FTD, 1,638 dementia and 6,265 controls) to identify disease-specific and shared proteins across NDs. We identified 5,187 proteins significantly associated with AD, 3,748 with PD and 2,380 with FTD that revealed both common and divergent proteomic signatures, which were confirmed by multiple analytical approaches and orthogonal validation. PD and FTD showed the highest overlap (r2 = 0.44) and AD and PD the least (r2 = 0.04). Immune system, glycolysis, and matrisome-related pathways were enriched across all NDs, while disease-specific pathways included apoptotic processes in AD, endoplasmic reticulum-phagosome impairment in PD and platelet dysregulation in FTD. Network analysis identified key upstream regulators (RPS27A in AD, IRAK4 in PD and MAPK1 in FTD) potentially driving these proteomic changes. These findings reveal distinct and shared mechanisms across NDs, highlighting potential regulatory proteins and pathways for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in neurodegeneration.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.