SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

NAD+-Boosters Improve Mitochondria Quality Control In Parkinson's Disease Models Via Mitochondrial UPR.

Adv Sci (Weinh) · 2025-07-20

DOI: 10.1002/advs.202408503PMID: 40685704

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Serving as a pivotal hub for cellular metabolism and intracellular signaling, the mitochondrion has emerged as a crucial organelle whose dysfunction is linked to many human diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders, particularly Parkinson's disease (PD). However, whether mitochondrial quality control (MQC) can be targeted for therapeutic interventions remains uncertain. This study uses clinical samples, molecular biology techniques, pharmacological interventions, and genetic approaches to investigate the significance of NAD+ levels in cross-species models of PD. These results reveal that treatment of rotenone-incubated cells with NAD+ boosters (such as NMN, siCD38, and NAT) increases UPRmt/mitophagy-related MQC, reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, inhibits apoptosis, and strengthen redox reactions. In vivo, NMN supplementation inhibits motor deficit and forestalls the neuropathological phenotypes of MPTP-induced PD mice, which are required for the atf4-related mitochondrial UPR pathway. Notably, bulk omics signatures and metabolomic profiling analyses of the striatum reveal NMN-induced transcriptional changes in genes and proteins involved in mitochondrial homeostasis. Thus, these findings demonstrate that the accelerated pathology in PD models is probably mediated by impaired MQC and that bolstering cellular NAD+ levels alleviates mitochondrial proteotoxic stress and mitigate PD phenotypes.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.