SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Perceived social support in the daily life of people with Parkinson's disease: a distinct role and potential classifier.

Sci Rep · 2025-07-24

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-12787-wPMID: 40707764

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Motor outcomes in Parkinson's disease (PD) have long been the primary diagnostic criteria and treatment targets. While non-motor outcomes of PD impact daily well-being, they are rarely targeted by interventions or utilized for classification. Despite promising evidence, the contributions of perceived social support (PSS) to PD detection and well-being in real-world settings remain unclear. Using remote monitoring technologies, we investigated the relationship between PSS and three non-motor measures-cognition, anxiety, and depression-in 92 participants: 45 PD and 47 matched-controls. To examine the specificity of PSS to non-motor features, we also examined the associations between PSS and three motor-related measures: disease severity, duration, or stage. Moreover, we developed machine-learning classifiers (ML) based on only non-motor features to identify disease status (PD/controls) in two cohorts: low and high PSS. PSS was significantly associated with non-motor measures in PD, with stronger correlations than in matched-controls in real-world settings. However, no significant correlations were found between PSS and the three motor-related measures, demonstrating PSS's limitations. While the ML classification models performed low in high-PSS, they classified 13% better in a low-PSS cohort (AUC = 0.8), demonstrating moderate-high discriminatory performance. Taken together, our findings underscore the role of PSS in PD, highlighting its distinct contributions to non-motor classification models and the daily well-being of patients.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.