NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Background/Objectives: Telehealth enhances access to specialty care, but stakeholder perspectives are often overlooked. The objective was to evaluate participant and provider satisfaction with a novel telehealth-enabled home safety program. Methods: This is a sub-investigation of a non-randomized pilot study of a novel telehealth-enabled home safety program that enrolled 23 persons with Parkinson's Disease (PwPs) at risk for falls and their respective care partners (CPs). Dyads participated in four to six televisits over three months, where they performed "virtual home tours" using a mobile platform (tablet mounted on a rolling stand) with a physical therapist to identify and mitigate environmental fall hazards. Satisfaction was assessed using PI-developed surveys and open feedback. Mobile platform usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results: A total of 95.65% of dyads were very to extremely satisfied with the entire program overall, and the therapist indicated the same for 73.91% of the dyads. Additionally, 95.65% of dyads reported gaining new awareness of home fall hazards. Difficulties maneuvering the mobile platform, using a tablet, and connectivity issues were common challenges noted. The mean score on SUS for the mobile platform was 65, indicating poor perceived usability, and most dyads indicated they would have preferred using a smartphone for the program. Other priorities, including competing health and personal obligations, along with resistance to change, were the primary barriers to implementing program recommendations. Conclusions: Our novel telehealth-enabled home safety program was well-received by patients and the study therapist. Using a smartphone and troubleshooting connectivity issues might help further improve the usability and accessibility of this program.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.