SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The Progression of NUS1-Associated Parkinson's Disease and the Diagnostic Potential of Plasma NgBR.

CNS Neurosci Ther · 2025-07-01

DOI: 10.1111/cns.70549PMID: 40726114

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

AimsThe study aimed to investigate the role of NUS1 variants in Parkinson's disease (PD) progression and evaluate plasma Nogo-B receptor (NgBR) as a potential biomarker.MethodsWe recruited 228 PD patients, including 38 with NUS1 variants (NUS1-PD) and 190 without (GU-PD), and all underwent at least two follow-up visits. Linear mixed-effects models assessed motor and non-motor symptom progression. Plasma NgBR levels were measured in PD, Multiple System Atrophy (MSA), Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), and healthy controls (HC), and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis evaluated its diagnostic efficacy.ResultsNUS1-PD demonstrated an earlier age at onset and more severe motor features than GU-PD at baseline. Longitudinal analyses showed similar progression rates of UPDRS III and H&Y stage (off-medication) in NUS1-PD and GU-PD, but a slower progression rate of urinary function in NUS1-PD (p = 0.024). Plasma NgBR levels were higher in PD than in HC, MSA, and PSP, with AUC values of 0.6832, 0.6716, and 0.6628, respectively. Plasma NgBR was associated with UPDRS III (p = 0.006) and cognitive impairment (p = 0.010).ConclusionNUS1 variants show no impact on PD progression, while plasma NgBR may serve as a potential biomarker for PD diagnosis and clinical characteristics.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.