NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
IntroductionThe genetic etiology of Parkinson's disease (PD) is complex; approximately 10% of patients with PD have various gene mutations that lead to familial forms of the disease. Recent analyses of non-coding repeat regions revealed that many neurodegenerative diseases are associated with pathological expansions. We evaluated the genetic background of non-coding repeat expansions in Japanese patients with PD.MethodsWe collected blood samples from 203 Japanese patients with PD and analyzed various non-coding repeat genes, including ATXN8OS, RFC1, C9ORF72, NOTCH2NLC, BEAN1/TK2, and NOP56, using PCR-Sanger sequencing, repeat-primed PCR assay, and long-read sequencing.ResultsThree patients with PD (1.5%) were found to have heterozygous repeat expansions in ATXN8OS, the gene causative of spinocerebellar ataxia type 8 and is associated with long non-coding RNA. One (0.5%) patient had compound heterozygous repeat expansions (AAGGG and ACAGG) in RFC1, the gene causative of cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, and vestibular areflexia syndrome, which encodes a DNA repair protein. No patient had repeat expansions in C9ORF72, NOTCH2NLC, BEAN1/TK2, or NOP56. All patients with ATXN8OS repeat expansions exhibited typical parkinsonism with relatively rare subjective dysphagia, which was confirmed by videofluoroscopic results. Functional imaging, such as dopamine-transporter single photon emission computed tomography, showed abnormal findings in patients with non-coding repeat expansions.DiscussionOur findings revealed the importance of non-coding repeat expansions in Japanese patients with PD. This is the first study to show the positive result of non-coding repeat expansions in many patients with PD in Japan.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.