SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Integrated evaluation of Nigrosome 1 sign, neuromelanin-sensitive MR and iron deposition.

Jpn J Radiol · 2025-08-18

DOI: 10.1007/s11604-025-01858-7PMID: 40824349

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

PurposeTo differentiate between Parkinson's Disease (PD) and healthy controls by using integrated analysis of PD-specific MR findings including deformation of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc), signal loss in neuromelanin (NM) sensitive MRI, and iron deposition in the deep gray matter (DGM) structures.Materials and methodsPatients with PD and healthy controls were recruited between August 2022 and December 2023. All subjects underwent 3 T MRI including a magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and a double flip angle multi-echo protocol as part of Strategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE). The data analysis included detecting the presence of Nigrosome-1 (N1) sign in the SNpc, signal intensity and volume of NM content and iron quantification through quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in DGMs. The 3D regions of interest were manually demarcated on QSM maps. Mean susceptibility values from global analysis (whole structure) as well as regional high iron analysis (age-based threshold) were extracted for each individual structure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using these parameters.ResultsNineteen patients with PD (68.0 ± 8.0 years, 10 males, Hoehn and Yahr scale 1 (n = 1), 2 (n = 13), 3 (n = 4), 4 (n = 1)) and 21 healthy controls (68.3 ± 8.6 years, 12 males) were enrolled. Discriminating PD from controls was successful using each method: N1 sign (P ConclusionsIntegrated analysis of PD specific MR findings including N1 sign, NM volume, and iron content in the DGM structures robustly discriminates between PD and healthy controls.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.