SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Health risk assessment for severe COVID-19 in Taiwan: a multi-centre electronic health record study.

J Glob Health · 2025-09-05

DOI: 10.7189/jogh.15.04236PMID: 40910541

Open accessresearch-article; Multicenter Study; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundAs the global battle against COVID-19 continues, understanding the factors contributing to severe outcomes remains critical for public health strategies. We aim to identify the determinants significantly influencing severe COVID-19 infection and mortality among the general population in Taiwan.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using data extracted from the Taipei Medical University Clinical Research Database from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022. We defined the primary outcomes as severe COVID-19 infection, including hospitalisation, ventilator use, intubation, and mortality. We performed logistic regression analyses to explore the association of various factors, including demographic characteristics, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and multiple comorbidities.ResultsAmong 96 489 confirmed COVID-19 cases, 44 996 (46.6%) were classified as high-risk patients. Compared to females, male patients had significantly higher risks of ventilator use (odds ratio (OR) = 1.245; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.147-1.352, P ConclusionsWe found that being male, having a lower BMI, and having certain chronic conditions increased the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, while peptic ulcer disease and hyperlipidaemia were linked to reduced risks. These findings highlight the need for targeted public health strategies for high-risk groups.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.