SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Midsagittal Midbrain Area and Midbrain-to-Pons-Ratio Cannot Distinguish Overlap Syndromes Between Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.

Clin Neuroradiol · 2025-09-12

DOI: 10.1007/s00062-025-01564-xPMID: 40938412

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

PurposeWhen amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a TDP-43 proteinopathy, and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), a tauopathy, are associated with frontotemporal dementia (ALS-FTD or PSP-FTD), clinical differentiation can be challenging. There are no established imaging biomarkers to differentiate ALS-FTD from PSP-FTD.MethodsWe evaluated the midsagittal midbrain area (MBA) and the midbrain-to-pons-(MB/P)-ratios in T1 MPRAGE MRI of 36 PSP cases (n = 14 PSP-FTD), 77 ALS cases (n = 10 ALS-FTD), and 72 healthy controls (HC).ResultsIn ALS, both parameters were indistinguishable from HC. Patients with ALS-FTD had low MBA-values and MB/P-ratios not significantly different from cases of PSP. While ROC-analyses provided an excellent diagnostic accuracy of both parameters for differentiating PSP from HC (AUCMBA = 0.974) as well as PSP from ALS (AUCMBA = 0.982), midbrain morphometry provided poor diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing ALS-FTD from PSP-FTD (AUCMBA = 0,614).ConclusionThe MBA and the MB/P-ratio are morphometric parameters that have proven reliable in atypical Parkinsonian syndromes. Both can distinguish between PSP and ALS in their typical clinical forms. However, they cannot differentiate between PSP-FTD and ALS-FTD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.