SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Apolipoprotein E Alleles and Motor Signs in Older Adults with Alzheimer's Dementia.

Int J Mol Sci · 2025-09-03

DOI: 10.3390/ijms26178562PMID: 40943487

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

We investigated associations between apolipoprotein E (APOE) alleles and motor manifestations in Alzheimer's dementia (AD) capitalizing on National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center data: the baseline evaluations of older adults (≥60 years) with a diagnosis of AD were analyzed. Those with a concomitant diagnosis Parkinson's disease or other parkinsonian syndrome, and those treated with anti-parkinsonian agents were excluded. Three APOE groups were formed: APOE2 (APOE2 carriers), APOE3 (APOE3/APOE3) and APOE4 (APOE4/APOE4, APOE4/APOE3). UPDRS-III was used to assess the presence or absence of motor signs in 9 domains. Adjusted binary logistic models featuring the three APOE groups as exposures and motor domains as outcomes were estimated. There were 389 individuals in the APOE2, 1799 in the APOE3 and 2791 in the APOE4 groups. Compared to the APOE2 group, individuals in the APOE4 group had lower odds of having at least one motor sign [0.64 (0.50-0.82)]. Among motor signs, rigidity [0.53 (0.34-0.81)], bradykinesia [0.56 (0.40-0.77)], impaired chair rise [0.54 (0.37-0.78)] and impaired posture-gait [0.54 (0.36, 0.81)] exhibited significant associations. Exploratory analyses featuring APOE genotypes suggested dose-response relationships for both APOE2 and APOE4. In conclusion, APOE2 confers a risk towards motor (mainly parkinsonian) signs in AD. APOE4 may have a protective effect.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.