SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Tau Enhances Aggregation of S100A9 Protein and Further Association of Its Fibrils.

Int J Mol Sci · 2025-09-15

DOI: 10.3390/ijms26188961PMID: 41009529

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The formation and accumulation of amyloid fibrils is implicated as one of the main reasons for the onset and progression of several widespread neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Decades of effort to unravel the intricate mechanisms of amyloid aggregation have only led to limited success in developing potent treatment modalities. Generally, this failure is considered to be the result of our incomplete understanding of the processes governing protein transitions into these insoluble fibrillar structures. Recently, a growing number of studies have reported that multiple amyloidogenic proteins, including ones related to the most debilitating disorders, can cross-interact during aggregation. This process leads to different nucleation and fibril elongation rates, aggregate structures, and even their cytotoxicity. Despite this revelation, the entire amyloid interactome remains largely unexplored. In this work, we investigate the cross-interaction between the Alzheimer's disease-related Tau protein and a pro-inflammatory S100A9 protein, which has recently been implicated as a possible modulator of amyloid aggregation. We show that Tau 2N4R enhances the amyloid aggregation propensity of S100A9 and mediates the self-association of the resulting fibrils, demonstrating this pairing's potential role in the onset of neurodegenerative disorders.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.