NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectivesIn our previous study, we investigated in de novo PD patients salivary biomarkers targeting different molecular pathways, including alpha-synuclein (a-syn), tau pathology, autophagy (MAPLC3beta), and inflammation (TNFalpha). Here, we aimed to investigate longitudinal changes in these salivary biomarkers with the goal of assessing their dynamic changes over time and their predictive value for clinical progression.MethodsA clinical and molecular 4-year follow-up (T1) was conducted on 43 PD patients of our previously molecularly characterized cohort of de novo PD patients (T0). Salivary levels of oligomeric and total a-syn, pS199-tau, total-tau, activated MAP-LC3beta, and TNFalpha were quantified using ELISA. Clinical assessments included motor and non-motor symptom scales. The Wilcoxon test was used to verify molecular and clinical variations from T0 to T1; regression analysis to determine whether salivary biomarkers at T0 could predict clinical progression and Spearman's correlations to explore correlations between changes in molecular biomarkers and clinical scores.ResultsOligomeric a-syn and MAPLC3beta dramatically decrease, while total a-syn, phosphorylated-tau, total-tau, and TNFalpha exhibited significantly higher levels from T0 to T1. Oligomeric and total a-syn, phosphorylated and total-tau at baseline predicted motor progression, while TNFalpha predicted non-motor worsening. Significant correlations were found for MAPLC3beta, phosphorylated tau, and TNFalpha with motor and non-motor scores, while no correlations emerged between a-syn species and clinical scores both at T0 and T1.InterpretationSalivary biomarkers dynamically reflect PD progression and predict long-term clinical outcomes. These findings support the use of saliva as a noninvasive, accessible source for predicting and monitoring disease progression in PD.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.