SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Cross-sectional analyses between the dietary index for gut microbiota and Parkinson's disease in the middle-aged and elderly population.

Nutr J · 2025-09-30

DOI: 10.1186/s12937-025-01206-5PMID: 41024009

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundThe evidence linking dietary indices to Parkinson's disease (PD) risk remains limited. This study investigated the association between the Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota (DI-GM) and PD risk in middle-aged and elderly populations.MethodsCross-sectional data were obtained from the 2007-2020 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), including 17,373 participants aged 40 years or older. PD was defined by antiparkinsonian medication use. DI-GM scores were calculated based on 14 dietary components. Multiple logistic regression and a restricted cubic spline model (RCS) were used to test the relationship between DI-GM and PD. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the results.ResultsAmong 17,373 participants, those with PD (n = 232) had lower DI-GM scores compared to non-PD individuals. Higher DI-GM scores (≥ 6) were associated with a 49% reduction in PD prevalence. RCS analysis showed a non-linear relationship between DI-GM and PD (P ConclusionsA gut microbiota-friendly diet, as measured by DI-GM, is associated with reduced PD risk, especially in the higher DI-GM score. This finding may inform future dietary guidelines for the prevention of PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.