SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Excessive daytime sleepiness and gait disturbances in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2025-09-16

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1626247PMID: 41035824

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundExcessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), which is common in Parkinson's disease (PD), has been reported to exacerbate gait disturbance in patients with PD, but there is a lack of objective assessment, as well as an unknown specific mechanism. The purpose of our study is to explore the relationship between EDS and gait parameters.MethodsSixty-one patients with PD were recruited and divided into the EDS group (n = 29) and the non-EDS group (n = 32) based on the scores of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The gait metrics of the two groups were then assessed by wearable devices and compared under various walking scenarios.ResultsCompared with the non-EDS group, the EDS group showed significantly shorter step lengths and stride lengths, slower walk speed and gait speed, reduced shank-max forward swing and sagittal angular velocity, and increased phase coordination indices and mean duration of turns. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a significant association between ESS scores and various gait parameters. Furthermore, multiple linear regression analysis confirmed that EDS is an independent factor influencing gait in patients with PD.ConclusionEDS was independently associated with gait disturbances in patients with PD, suggesting that EDS symptoms warrant serious attention in clinical practice.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.