SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Analysis of a Modified Version of the Inventory of Non-Ataxia Signs Over 12 Years in Patients with Friedreich's Ataxia in the EFACTS Study.

Mov Disord · 2025-10-10

DOI: 10.1002/mds.70084PMID: 41070559

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundFriedreich's ataxia is a rare, neurodegenerative, multisystem disorder. While ataxia is a hallmark, non-ataxia signs, including muscle weakness, spasticity, and dysphagia are equally disabling. The Inventory of Non-Ataxia Signs (INAS) is a symptom list transformable to a 16-item count.ObjectiveTo evaluate the responsiveness of a modified INAS in this population.MethodsParticipants were drawn from the European Friedreich's Ataxia Consortium for Translational Studies (EFACTS). The modified INAS count (presence/absence, 0-16 scale) and modified INAS sum (severity-weighted, 0-84 scale) were evaluated using linear mixed-models and standardized response means (SRMs). Items rare (ConclusionsThe modified INAS sum showed good responsiveness over 5 years but not over 1-3 years. It may supplement existing outcome measures, contributing to holistic assessment of this multisystem disease, especially in non-ambulatory patients, in whom ataxia-focused measures may show ceiling effects, and children, who typically progress faster. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.