SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Apomorphine is a novel necroptosis inhibitor targeting mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein oligomerization.

Cell Death Discov · 2025-10-13

DOI: 10.1038/s41420-025-02763-8PMID: 41083456

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Necroptosis, a form of programmed cell death, has emerged as a promising therapeutic target. Although several RIPK1 inhibitors have demonstrated favorable safety profiles in clinical trials, clinical translation of necroptosis-targeted therapies remains limited by modest efficacy, limited specificity, and species-specific activity of compounds such as necrosulfonamide (NSA). To resolve these challenges, this study identified a potential necroptosis inhibitor from a clinical drug library. Apomorphine (APO), a non-addictive morphine derivative used to treat Parkinson's disease, was found to inhibit necroptosis by sterically blocking key residues involved in mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) activation and oligomerization, as confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. APO is redox sensitive and prone to auto-oxidation. The oxidized form of APO (Ox-APO) showed stronger binding to MLKL than the reduced form of APO (Re-APO), as demonstrated by surface plasmon resonance analysis. Ox-APO significantly ameliorated tissue damage in two murine necroptosis models: dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis and acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver injury. Collectively, these data highlight the therapeutic potential of APO as a necroptosis-specific inhibitor in necroptosis-related diseases in both humans and mice.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.