Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundProgressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is typically characterized by vertical supranuclear gaze palsy and early falls, referred to as Richardson's syndrome (PSP-RS). Other presentations include postural instability (PSP-PI), Parkinsonism (PSP-P), speech/language disorder (PSP-SL), frontal presentation (PSP-F), ocular motor dysfunction (PSP-OM), and corticobasal syndrome (PSP-CBS). However, differences across the early presentations and their subsequent clinical courses remain to be elucidated.ObjectiveThis study aimed to characterize early PSP subtypes and their subsequent progressions using a large postmortem dataset.MethodsAn automated pipeline incorporating fine-tuned Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) was developed. The pipeline collected 195 clinical features with onset information from autopsy-confirmed PSP cases without significant neurodegenerative co-pathologies.ResultsA structured clinicopathologic dataset from 588 patients was analyzed. The results from unsupervised clustering were distilled into a decision tree model. The mutually exclusive algorithm identified seven subtypes: PSP-PF (postural and frontal dysfunction), PSP-RS, PSP-PI, PSP-P, PSP-SL, PSP-F, and PSP-OM, based on five clinical manifestations: frontal presentation, postural instability, ocular motor dysfunction, speech/language disorder, and Parkinsonism. PSP-PF showed rapid progression, the shortest median disease duration (six years), and high tau burden in cortical and subcortical regions. In PSP-F, frontal presentation preceded other symptoms by four years, with a nine-year disease duration-second longest after PSP-P (10 years). PSP-CBS was not identified as an independent subtype.ConclusionsThis data-driven study identified a novel, aggressive PSP phenotype characterized by early postural and frontal dysfunction. Early subtyping using the decision tree model would help clinicians estimate progression and facilitate early patient recruitment for clinical trials.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.