SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Risk of Traumatic Injury in Patients With Early-Onset Parkinson's Disease: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study.

Parkinsons Dis · 2025-10-12

DOI: 10.1155/padi/6970763PMID: 41116904

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionEarly-onset Parkinson's disease (EOPD) shares similar clinical features to the late-onset form, but the risk of injury remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of traumatic injury, including fracture, in patients with EOPD.MethodsThis matched cohort study used a Japanese administrative claims database to compare the risk of traumatic injury and fracture between EOPD patients and the general population. EOPD was defined by diagnosis between ages 21 and 49 together with the initiation of anti-PD medication. Crude incidence rates and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated using Poisson and Cox regression models. Subgroup analyses were performed by age and sex.ResultsIn 368 EOPD patients and 1586 matched individuals from the general population, the traumatic injury rate was slightly higher in EOPD patients (9.5 vs. 7.9 events per 100 person-years), but the difference was not substantial (aHR, 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-1.5). Fracture risk in the groups was similar, at 1.4 events per 100 person-years (aHR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5-1.6). Subgroup analyses showed an increased traumatic injury risk in EOPD patients aged 40-49 years (aHR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8) and in females (aHR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8). No clear differences were observed in other comparisons.ConclusionNo major difference in traumatic injury or fracture risk was found between EOPD patients and the general population. However, preventive interventions may be warranted for patients aged 40-49 years and for females due to their elevated injury risk.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.