SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Insulin-degrading enzyme confers neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease by inhibiting the Hippo signaling pathway.

Cell Death Dis · 2025-10-24

DOI: 10.1038/s41419-025-08055-4PMID: 41136383

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder primarily marked by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons and pathological α-synuclein (α-syn) accumulation. Although insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) has been implicated in both type 2 diabetes mellitus and amyloid-protein clearance, its precise relevance to PD pathogenesis remains unclear. In this study, we show that IDE expression is reduced in the nigrostriatal region of aging homozygous A53T α-syn mice and in α-syn-overexpressing SH-SY5Y PD cells. Overexpression of IDE alleviated motor deficits, reduced pathological α-syn levels, and protected dopaminergic neurons in A53T α-syn mice. In SH-SY5Y PD model cells, IDE overexpression reduced α-syn-induced toxicity, whereas IDE knockdown exacerbated it. Integrated transcriptomic and proteomic analyses revealed that the Hippo signaling pathway serves as a major downstream target of IDE. Notably, inhibition of MST1/2, a pivotal Hippo kinase, recapitulated IDE's neuroprotective effects by diminishing α-syn pathology and neuronal apoptosis. Hence, IDE confers neuroprotection partly via suppression of the Hippo signaling pathway, and pharmacological targeting of the IDE-Hippo axis may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.