SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Risk of Cognitive Decline in Women with Parkinson's Disease Is Reduced by Early Age at Menarche.

Neurol Int · 2025-10-05

DOI: 10.3390/neurolint17100161PMID: 41149782

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting men more frequently than women, a difference that might be due to many factors, including sexual hormones. Estrogens seem to confer a protective effect on the nigrostriatal pathway in experimental studies but their effects on cognition in patients with PD are unknown.AimTo investigate the impact of the exogenous and endogenous estrogens on cognitive impairment in women with PD.Methods and materialsWe recruited and consecutively interviewed outpatient women affected by PD. Each patient underwent a cognitive assessment via the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MoCA), an anamnestic collection of the reproductive lifespan variables and clinical features. We investigated if some of the reproductive lifespan variables investigated could predict cognition outcomes in post-menopausal women with PD.ResultsA total of 90 women with PD were recruited. Women with MoCA ≥ 26 (n = 27) had a lower median age at menarche (11 [11,12] vs. 13 [12-14], p p = 0.6), and less advanced disease (1 [1,2] vs. 2 [1-3], p = 0.02). Among all the reproductive life-span variables, only earlier age at menarche significantly predicted higher scores on MoCA (aOR = 0.5 [0.3-0.8], p = 0.005). No other clinical and reproductive factors have been shown to have an influence on cognitive scores.ConclusionsAge at menarche correlated with cognitive outcomes. Our study suggests that earlier exposure to endogenous estrogens during a phase of development and plasticity of the brain might preserve women with PD from cognitive decline.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.