SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Hemispheric lateralization of dopamine transporter binding in Parkinson's disease.

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2025-10-27

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.108076PMID: 41151477

Check source for accessMulticenter Study; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionAsymmetries in dopaminergic depletion between the right and left cerebral hemispheres could provide insights about the development and progression of cerebral neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease. We investigated whether more patients with Parkinson's disease exhibited lower left than right dopamine radiotracer binding in two large cohorts.MethodsThis cross-sectional study retrospectively analyzed consecutive 18F-FE-PE2I PET scans conducted at the Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, from May 2020 to December 2024 (Aarhus dataset, n = 1257). Findings were compared with an international, multicenter, research cohort (PPMI dataset, n = 1359).ResultsA slim majority (53 %) of patients had lower binding in the left putamen than in the right (Aarhus dataset: P = 0.0803; PPMI dataset: P = 0.0466; two tailed-binomial test). This difference was driven by patients with higher levels of asymmetry and remained consistent across age, sex, and disease duration, and was not observed in healthy controls. Based on handedness, there was a marginal majority of patients with lower dopamine tracer binding in the dominant hemisphere, which was significant among right-handed (53 %, P = 0.0160) but not among left-handed (54 %, P = 0.3071). These trends were supported by our models, indicating that handedness explained very little of the variance in hemispheric lateralization.ConclusionThe predominance of lower dopamine binding in the dominant hemisphere is narrow and only marginally significant, even in large datasets. Our estimates are more modest compared to those previously reported, possibly because we did not exclude symmetric patients.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.