SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Directed evolution of drug-like Aβ conformation-specific antibodies.

Front Immunol · 2025-10-13

DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1655893PMID: 41159032

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Monoclonal antibodies that recognize conformational epitopes in protein aggregates are important for research, diagnostic, and therapeutic applications related to neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Unfortunately, it remains challenging to discover and engineer high-quality conformational antibodies that are specific for protein aggregates and possess optimal combinations of three key binding properties, namely high affinity, high conformational specificity, and low off-target binding. Here we report a directed evolution approach for generating high-quality conformational antibodies against Alzheimer's Aβ fibrils in the native IgG format. Our directed evolution approach uses targeted mutagenesis, yeast surface display, cell sorting, and deep sequencing to identify antibody candidates with optimized binding properties. Notably, we find that this approach yields robust isolation of IgGs with higher affinity, higher conformational specificity, and lower off-target binding than multiple clinical-stage Aβ antibodies, including aducanumab and crenezumab. This antibody engineering platform can be readily applied to generate conformational antibodies against diverse types of peptide and protein aggregates linked to human diseases.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.