SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Mediation analysis for integrating motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, cognitive function, and gait characteristics.

Front Neurol · 2025-10-13

DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1659581PMID: 41159194

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundIn Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, the severity of motor symptoms is closely related to the degree of gait disorder and cognitive impairment; notably, the latter also exhibits a significant correlation with gait disorder. Evidently, there exists a complex relationship between motor symptoms, cognitive function, and gait characteristics.MethodsThis study aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of the relationships among MDS-UPDRS III score, MoCA score, and gait parameters by constructing a mediation model.ResultsWe found that a higher MDS-UPDRS III score was associated with a smaller plantar dorsiflexion angle, slower velocity, and worse swing phase symmetry, and these associations were not mediated by the MoCA score. Age was a confounder in the relationship between MDS-UPDRS III score, MoCA, and velocity. A higher MDS-UPDRS III score was associated with shorter stride length, and this association was partially mediated by the MoCA score.ConclusionThe results indicated that, when analyzing plantar dorsiflexion angle and swing phase symmetry in PD patients, the influence of motor symptoms was dominant; when analyzing stride length, motor symptoms and cognitive function need to be considered simultaneously; when analyzing velocity, the influence of motor symptoms and age should be focused on.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.