SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The relation of eye movements to the occurrence of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease.

Brain Commun · 2025-10-15

DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf402PMID: 41169272

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Freezing of gait is a debilitating motor symptom in Parkinson's disease that significantly increases fall risk and impairs quality of life. The poorly understood pathophysiology of freezing of gait presents challenges for early prediction and therapeutic intervention. This prospective study investigated whether eye movement abnormalities, specifically in the anti-saccade paradigm, could predict freezing of gait onset in Parkinson's disease patients over a two-year follow-up period. We analysed longitudinal data from the Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative, focusing on Parkinson's disease patients without freezing of gait at baseline who underwent comprehensive clinical evaluations and eye movement recordings. Anti-saccade reaction time and error ratio, combined with clinical measures including right upper extremity rigidity, demonstrated significant predictive value for freezing of gait development within two years. These findings suggest that eye movement deficits and upper limb rigidity emerge years before freezing of gait onset, indicating a prodromal phase in freezing of gait pathogenesis. The predictive relationship between these measures supports the hypothesis of shared neural substrates, potentially involving the mesencephalic locomotor region, in the development of both oculomotor dysfunction and gait freezing episodes.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.