SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

VGF AQEE- and GGEE-peptides differentiate between dementia types.

J Neurol · 2025-11-04

DOI: 10.1007/s00415-025-13441-1PMID: 41186756

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are neurodegenerative disorders with overlapping clinical features, making differential diagnosis challenging. The AQEE and GGEE peptides, derived from the proVGF neuroprotein, have emerged as potential cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for dementia. Indeed, we previously observed a reduction in AQEE-10 levels using selected reaction monitoring (SRM) and GGEE levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in a cohort of DLB patients compared to both controls and AD patients. To better investigate the diagnostic utility of these peptides, we analyzed CSF samples from both the original cohort and a newly recruited cohort. The new cohort (cohort 1) included patients, from Ulm University Hospital, with Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) and DLB (combined as PDD/DLB; n = 18), and AD (n = 19). The previously analyzed cohort (cohort 2), from the Amsterdam University Medical Center, included DLB (n = 44), AD (n = 20), and cognitively healthy controls (n = 22). AQEE-10 levels were quantified by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in cohort 1 and by ELISA in both cohorts. GGEE levels were measured by ELISA in cohort 1 to corroborate and extend previous findings. MRM-based analysis revealed a significant reduction of AQEE-10 levels in DLB compared to both controls and AD (p < 0.05; ROC-AUC: 78% and 82%, respectively). This finding was confirmed by ELISA, for both AQEE-10 and GGEE peptide levels, along with a positive correlation between their concentrations. These results support AQEE-10 and GGEE as promising peptide biomarkers for distinguishing DLB from other dementia.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.