SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Heritability and shared environmental effects of brain diseases in 12,040 extended families.

NPJ Dement · 2025-11-03

DOI: 10.1038/s44400-025-00030-2PMID: 41195301

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Brain diseases have complex patterns of genetic and environmental risk factors, and better understanding of these risks is required for more effective prevention strategies. Participants of the Dutch Brain Research Registry provided detailed information on family structure and occurrence of brain diseases. A total of 12,040 participants (73% female, aged 64.9 ± 11 years) provided information on 101,379 family members (53% female, aged 62 ± 25 years). We estimated heritability (h 2) of the nine most common brain diseases using polygenic modeling in SOLAR and assessed variations in h 2 through bootstrapping; Alzheimer's disease (AD) (h 2 = 73, range 53-86, P fdr h 2 = 72, range 10-98, P fdr = 0.030), frontotemporal dementia (FTD) (h 2 = 48, range 0-97, P fdr = 0.132), vascular dementia (VaD) (h 2 = 41, range 7-64, P = 0.003), Lewy Body dementia (h 2 = 34, range 0-58, P = 0.132), iCVA (h 2 = 27, 6-59, P fdr = 0.013), hCVA (h 2 = 29, 8-57, P fdr = 0.007), Parkinson's disease (PD) (h 2 = 38, 6-66, P fdr = 0.013), and multiple sclerosis (h 2 = 10, 10-97, P fdr c 2 = 5.8%, P fdr = 0.011), VaD (c 2 = 9.0%, P fdr = 0.021), FTD (c 2 = 9.7%, P fdr = 0.33), iCVA (c 2 = 15.9%, P fdr c 2 = 14.9%, P fdr = 0.005), and PD (c 2 = 7.5%, P fdr = 0.25). These findings underscore the significance of genetic contribution to most brain diseases and the important role of shared environments in AD and vascular-related conditions, highlighting initiatives to mitigate modifiable risk factors.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.