SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Global network and local vulnerabilities underlie brain atrophy across Parkinson's disease stages.

Brain · 2026-07-01

DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaf432PMID: 41237265

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease is associated with extensive structural brain changes. Recent work has proposed that the spatial pattern of disease pathology is shaped by both network spread and local vulnerability. However, few studies have assessed these biological frameworks in large patient samples across disease stages. Analysing the largest imaging cohort in Parkinson's disease to date (n = 3096 patients), we investigated the roles of network architecture and local brain features by relating regional abnormality maps to normative profiles of connectivity, intrinsic networks, cytoarchitectonics, neurotransmitter receptor densities and gene expression. We found widespread cortical and subcortical atrophy in Parkinson's disease to be associated with advancing disease stage, longer time since diagnosis and poorer global cognition. Structural brain connectivity best explained cortical atrophy patterns in Parkinson's disease and across disease stages. These patterns were robust among individual patients. The precuneus, lateral temporal cortex and amygdala were identified as likely network-based epicentres, with high convergence across disease stages. Individual epicentres varied significantly among patients, yet they consistently localized to the default mode and limbic networks. Furthermore, we showed that regional overexpression of genes implicated in synaptic structure and signalling conferred increased susceptibility to brain atrophy in Parkinson's disease. In summary, this study demonstrates in a well-powered sample that structural brain abnormalities in Parkinson's disease across disease stages and within individual patients are influenced by both network spread and local vulnerability.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.