SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Dataset on Gait Analysis of Parkinsonian Subjects: Effect of Nordic Walking.

Sci Data · 2025-11-21

DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-06209-9PMID: 41271809

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Dataset; data-paper; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The proposed dataset provides biomechanical data from patients with Parkinson's disease, collected to evaluate the effects of Nordic Walking on motor performance compared with Adapted Physical Activity. The study included 24 individuals with Parkinson's disease at Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3, all able to walk more than 200 meters in the 6-minute walk test, and scoring ≥71 on the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III. Fourteen participants underwent Nordic Walking (90 minutes, twice weekly), while ten participated in Adapted Physical Activity sessions (60 minutes, two to three times weekly). Both interventions lasted 12 weeks. Pre- and post-intervention evaluations included joint angles, ground reaction forces, gait parameters, and electromyographic activity. Each assessment session comprised a static trial and three walking trials, recorded using a motion capture system, force plates, and a 16-channel electromyographic setup. The dataset includes raw and processed data (.c3d,.csv, mot,.trc), along with anthropometric measurements and calibration files. Organized into pre- and post-intervention sessions, it provides a publicly accessible resource for biomechanical analyses, validation studies, and neurorehabilitation research.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.