SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Psychiatric Comorbidities in Parkinson's Disease: A Moroccan Perspective on Anxiety and Depression.

Diseases · 2025-11-06

DOI: 10.3390/diseases13110361PMID: 41294901

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background/Objectives: An individual's quality of life is greatly impacted by the motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD), which include anxiety and depression. Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), this study sought to determine the prevalence of anxiety and depression in Moroccan patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and investigate any possible associations with clinical characteristics and pharmacological treatment. Methods: The HADS was used to assess 100 PD patients in total. Clinical and demographic information, including prescription drug use, was gathered. The relationships between HADS scores and clinical factors were evaluated using Pearson's correlation. Results: According to the HADS assessment, 20% of respondents had no anxiety symptoms, 17% had borderline symptoms, and 63% of patients reported definite anxiety symptoms. Of those with depression, 24% showed no symptoms, 14% were borderline, and 62% were certain. The average HADS-A and HADS-D scores were 2.34 and 2.43, respectively. L-DOPA alone was used to treat half of the patients, while combinations of Trivastal, Sifrol, anticholinergics, or antidepressants were given to the other half. There were no discernible correlations between HADS scores and clinical or demographic traits. Conclusions: The HADS is a useful instrument for assessing anxiety and depression in PD patients. Regardless of the method of treatment or stage of the disease, psychiatric symptoms are prevalent. For PD patients to benefit from early interventions and achieve an improved quality of life, routine screening is crucial.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.